| 490 | 2 | 106 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:探讨基于社会认知理论的阶段性干预对双相情感障碍患者认知功能、自我效能及心理社会功能的影响。方法:本研究为回顾性分析。研究对象为2022年8月-2024年8月于某院接受治疗的106例双相情感障碍患者,根据干预方案将其分为干预组(基于社会认知理论的阶段性干预,n=49)与对照组(常规干预,n=57),于6个月后评估并比较两组认知功能、自我效能、心理状态及社会功能。结果:干预后,干预组威斯康星卡片分类测验完成分类数显著高于对照组(t=2.165,P<0.05),持续错误数、随机错误数及总错误数均显著低于对照组(t=-5.403,-3.267,-5.920;P<0.05),自我效能感量表评分显著高于对照组(t=3.647,P<0.05),抑郁自评量表、倍克-拉范森躁狂量表评分均显著低于对照组(t=-4.079,-2.967;P<0.05),社会功能缺陷筛查量表中对外界的兴趣及关心、个人生活自理、家庭内活动、家庭外社会活动、家庭职能、社会退缩、责任心及计划性、职业与工作评分均显著低于对照组(t=-2.515,-2.051,-2.341,-3.969,-2.481,-2.171,-2.517,-2.439;P<0.05),差异有统计学意义。结论:基于社会认知理论的阶段性干预有利于提升双相情感障碍患者的认知功能、自我效能,并可有效改善其心理状态与社会功能。
Abstract:Objective:To explore the impact of phase-based intervention based on social-cognitive theoryon cognitive function,self-efficacy,and psychosocial functioning in patients with bipolar disorder.Methods:This retrospective study included 106 bipolar disorderpatients treated at our hospital from August 2022 to August 2024.Participants were divided into an intervention group(Social-cognitive theory-based phase-based intervention,n=49)and a control group(routine intervention,n=57).Cognitive function,self-efficacy,psychological status,and social functioning were assessed and compared after 6 months.Results:Post intervention,the intervention group showed significantly higher completed categories in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test than the control group(t=2.165,P<0.05),with significantly fewer perseverative errors,random errors,and total errors(t=-5.403,-3.267,-5.920;P<0.05).The intervention group scored significantly higher on the General Self-Efficacy Scale(t=3.647,P<0.05).Scores on the Self-Rating Depression Scale and Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale were significantly lower in the intervention group(t=-4.079,-2.967;P<0.05).The intervention group also demonstrated significantly lower scores on all subscales of the Social Disability Screening Schedule(SDSS),including interest in surroundings,self-care,household activities,social activities,family role,social withdrawal,responsibility and planning,and work performance(t=-2.515,-2.051,-2.341,-3.969,-2.481,-2.171,-2.517,-2.439;P<0.05).Conclusion:Social-cognitive theory-based phase-based intervention can improve cognitive function and self-efficacy in bipolar disorder patients,while effectively ameliorate psychological status and psychosocial functioning.
[1]Scott M R,McClung C A.Bipolar disorder[J].Curr Opin Neurobiol,2023,83:102801
[2]李娇丽,魏小方,张果,等.共情理论的个性化干预措施对双相情感障碍患者情绪调节和康复的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2025,33(2):177-181
[3]Carbone E A,de Filippis R,Caroleo M,et al.Antisocial personality disorder in bipolar disorder:A systematic review[J].Medicina(Kaunas),2021,57(2):183-183
[4]张歆钰,马辛,西英俊,等.双相障碍心理健康教育互联网平台简介及应用进展[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(8):1276-1280
[5]Ehrlich T J,Ryan K A,Burdick K E,et al.Cognitive subgroups and their longitudinal trajectories in bipolar disorder[J].Acta Psychiatr Scand,2022,146(3):240-250
[6]Wu Y K,Su Y A,Zhu L L,et al.Intrinsic functional connectivity correlates of cognitive deficits involving sustained attention and executive function in bipolar disorder[J].BMC Psychiatry,2023,23(1):584-584
[7]Abraham K M,Miller C J,Birgenheir D G,et al.Self-efficacy and quality of life among people with bipolar disorder[J].J Nerv Ment Dis,2014,202(8):583-588
[8]袁家鹏,周云,尹娥.双相情感障碍患者稳定期残留症状与其家庭及社会功能的关系[J].国际精神病学杂志,2024,51(5):1405-1408+1429
[9]van Sluijs E M,van Poppel M N,van Mechelen W.Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary care:Are they effective?[J].Am J Prev Med,2004,26(4):330-343
[10]张培,张素兰,石青霞,等.阶段性需求满足的多学科协同干预对NSCLC患者认知度、负性情绪、应对方式的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(5):1-5
[11]李娜娜,李静,吕桦.基于依从性曲线变化规律的阶段性护理结合激励式心理干预对脑梗死恢复期患者康复自我效能感及肢体功能恢复的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2024,9(3):130-133
[12]范慧杰,武晓婷,台笑蕾,等.阶段性认知行为干预对老年结直肠癌患者疾病进展恐惧及心理弹性的影响[J].癌症进展,2025,23(4):406-409
[13]Mahdizadeh S M,Sany S B T,Sarpooshi D R,et al.Predictors of preventive behavior of nosocomial infections in nursing staff:A structural equation model based on the social cognitive theory[J].BMC Health Serv Res,2021,21(1):1187-1187
[14]汪珍,汪小凤,游龙飞,等.基于社会认知理论的阶段性护理干预对创伤性脑出血患者认知功能、自我管理及自我效能的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2025,25(12):4920-4925
[15]郑绵君,包金莲,黄红丽.社会认知理论信息技术联合助产士主导全孕期体重管理模式对孕妇自我效能、孕期体重管理及妊娠结局的影响[J].黑龙江医学,2023,47(14):1685-1688
[16]胡银燕,贺晓映,刘敏君,等.基于社会认知理论的运动干预在癌症幸存者中应用的范围综述[J].护理与康复,2025,24(5):37-43
[17]中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:96-100
[18]Liu Z,Tam W C,Xie Y,et al.The relationship between regional cerebral blood flow and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in negative schizophrenia[J].Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2002,56(1):3-7
[19]马旻,艾自胜,石志道.一般自我效能感量表在中老年2型糖尿病患者中的信度效度检验[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2022,43(4):515-520
[20]金婷,张磊晶.我国常用的抑郁自评量表介绍及应用[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2017,17(5):366-369
[21]张明园.倍克一拉范森躁狂量表(BRMS)[J].上海精神医学,1984(2):66-67
[22]张明圆.精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1998:81-93+214-217
[23]杨旭宁,吕晓静,李晓红.双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者血清多巴胺甲状腺激素与认知功能的关系[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2025,31(2):10-13
[24]王琳,王琴.双相情感障碍患者缓解期认知功能损害特点及与日常生活能力及生活质量的关系[J].精神医学杂志,2024,37(3):249-252
[25]何海英,钟伦淳,朱可洲,等.双相情感障碍患者自知力与认知功能及冲动攻击行为的相关性分析[J].临床护理杂志,2024,23(2):19-21
[26]卢青春,段文涛,王芳.双相情感障碍患者病耻感与生存质量的关系:自我效能感及社会支持的中介效应研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2025,31(1):45-50
[27]邓红冬,李素芳.双相情感障碍患者自我效能与社会支持的相关性研究[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2019,26(12):154-156
[28]陈文红,唐芳,刘芸.社会认知理论指导下的康复促进方案对髋关节置换术后患者康复的作用研究[J].当代护士,2025,32(13):84-88
[29]蹇丹,秦欢.以自我效能理论为基础的护理干预结合阶段性目标干预对产后盆底肌康复训练患者康复积极性及盆底功能的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2025,10(4):179-182
[30]王跃鸣,胡慧娜,张璐,等.阶段性护理干预对癫痫患者心理状态、自我效能及生活质量的影响[J].四川解剖学杂志,2023,31(4):114-116
[31]徐良雄,石聿树,熊昌娥,等.社会认知交互训练对双相情感障碍患者社会功能影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2019,27(9):1286-1289
[32]曹书改,李珍珍.阶段变化理论导向的认知行为干预在首发抑郁症患者中的应用观察[J].首都食品与医药,2021,28(2):122-123
基本信息:
DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2026.06.003
中图分类号:R749.4
引用信息:
[1]陈丽玉,李阳,蓝晨.社会认知理论的阶段性干预对双相情感障碍患者认知功能、自我效能及心理社会功能的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2026,34(06):814-819.DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2026.06.003.
基金信息:
浙江省丽水市科技计划项目(编号:2023SJZC037)
2026-02-13
2026-02-13
2026-02-13