| 9,979 | 432 | 103 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的考察生活满意度量表中文版在一般民众中使用的信度和效度。方法用生活满意度量表、积极情感-消极情感量表和总体幸福感单题量表对509名民众进行调查。结果1量表5个条目与总分之间的相关在0.70~0.80(P<0.001)之间,各个题目之间的相关在0.29~0.53(P<0.001)之间;2验证性因素分析显示,5个项目的载荷在0.59~0.80(P<0.001)之间,解释42.2%的生活满意度的方差,拟合指数为:χ2=33.56,χ2/df=6.71,GFI=0.97,CFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.071;3生活满意度量表与积极情感分量表和总体幸福感量表达到极其显著的正相关,与消极情感分量表达到极其显著的负相关;4信度分析的结果显示,量表的α系数为0.78,折半信度为0.70。结论生活满意度量表中文版在一般民众中使用具有良好的信度和效度。
Abstract:Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Stisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS) for general demos. Methods Five hundred and nine demos were investigated with Stisfaction with Life Scale,Positive and Negative Affect Scale and General Well-Being Scale. Results ①Item-total score correlations were between 0.70 and 0.80 (P<0.001),and the correlations within items were between 0.29 and 0.53 (P<0.001). ②The results of confirmatory factort analysis showed that the five items loading were between 0.59 and 0.80(P<0.001),and explain 42.2% of the variance,And the χ2 was 33.56,χ2/df was 6.71,GFI was 0.97,CFI was 0.96,RMSEA was 0.071. ③Criterion-related validity analysis showed that life satisfaction was positively related to positive affect and general well-being,and negatively related to negative affect. ④Reliability analysis showed that the scale's Cronbach α and the split-half coefficients were 0.78 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusions The Stisfaction with Life Scale has good reliability and validity for Chinese demos.
[1]周厚余,周莲英.城市居民生活满意感与心理健康的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(7):806-808
[2]Lucas Richard E,Diener Ed,Eunkook Suh.Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71(3):616-628
[3]Diener Ed,Suh Eunkook M.Subjective Well-Being:Three Decades of Progress[J].Psychological Bulletin,1999,125(2):276-302
[4]邱林,郑雪.主观幸福感的结构及其与人格特质的关系[J].应用心理学,2005,11(4):330-335
[5]Matt Vassar.A Note on the Score Reliability for the Satisfaction with Life Scale:an RG Study[J].Social Indictors Research,2008,86:47-57
[6]Watson D,Clark L A,Tellegen A.Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect:The PANAS Scales[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,54(6):1063-1070
[7]辛自强,池丽萍.快乐感与社会支持的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(5):442-447
[8]Campbell A.Subjective measures of well-being[J].American psychologist,1976,31:117-124
[9]邱林.主观幸福感的结构及其与大三人格的关系[D].广州:华南师范大学,2003
基本信息:
DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.08.026
中图分类号:B841.7
引用信息:
[1]熊承清,许远理.生活满意度量表中文版在民众中使用的信度和效度[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2009,17(08):948-949.DOI:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2009.08.026.
基金信息:
2006年度河南省社会科学规划项目《河南省构建和谐社会的心理因素--民众情感智力与主观幸福感的关系研究》(2006FSH008)的阶段成果